Is there a pin-compatible replacement for A2008WV-6P?

No. A pin-compatible replacement must match the PCB footprint and be mechanically compatible with the mating connector. While some alternatives have the same footprint, they belong to different series (e.g., HY, PH) and will not mate correctly.

What risks should I check before replacing A2008WV-6P?

The main risks are mechanical incompatibility and electrical downgrades. Ensure any replacement can mate with your existing cable housing. Also, verify the current rating; most alternatives are rated for 2A, below the original's 3A, which requires circuit analysis.

A2008WV-6P Alternatives, Datasheet & Cross Reference | CJT

Finding a substitute for the CJT A2008WV-6P, a 6-pin 2.0mm vertical header, requires careful review. While many parts share the same footprint, key differences in current rating and mechanical series present significant risks for a direct replacement.

AI replacement insight

Package riskhigh

While PCB footprint may match, mating dimensions and keying are different.

Electrical riskmedium

Most alternatives have a lower current rating (2A vs 3A), which could cause overheating or failure.

Sourcing risklow

Many 2.0mm pitch headers exist, but finding a true compatible part requires careful selection.

Can it be replaced directly?

No direct, drop-in replacement has been identified. All candidates have significant electrical or mechanical differences requiring a design review.

Best replacement path

Source a connector from the same CJT A2008 series or a documented cross-reference. The suggested alternatives have lower current ratings and are not mechanically compatible.

Main risk

The primary risk is mechanical incompatibility. Connectors are part of a system, and a different series header will not mate with the original housing.

Recommended alternatives

A 6-pin, 2.0mm pitch vertical header with a lower current rating; mechanical compatibility with mating parts is unlikely.

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factor	A2008WV-6P	WAFER-HY2.0-6PLB	WF-1A200A6P	ZX-HY2.0-6PLT	Compatibility / risk
Current	3 A	2 A	2.0 A	2.0 A	2 A / 2.0 A — Candidate current rating is 33% lower.; WF-1A200A6P: Candidate current rating is 33% lower.; ZX-HY2.0-6PLT: Candidate current rating is 33% lower.
Package	Through Hole, Vertical	Through Hole, Vertical	Through Hole, Vertical	Through Hole, Vertical	Through Hole, Vertical — PCB footprint and orientation appear to match.; WF-1A200A6P: PCB footprint and orientation appear to match.; ZX-HY2.0-6PLT: PCB footprint and orientation appear to match.
Pinout	6 / 2.0mm	6 / 2.0mm	6 / 2.0mm	6 / 2.0mm	6 / 2.0mm — Pin count and pitch match.; WF-1A200A6P: Pin count and pitch match.; ZX-HY2.0-6PLT: Pin count and pitch match.
Application	A2008 Series	HY Series	WF Series	HY Series	HY Series / WF Series — Different connector series implies mechanical incompatibility with mating parts.; WF-1A200A6P: Different connector series implies mechanical incompatibility with mating parts.; ZX-HY2.0-6PLT: Different connector series implies mechanical incompatibility with mating parts.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

No ideal alternative was found. Candidates like ZX-HY2.0-6PLT offer a similar footprint but have a lower current rating (2A vs 3A) and are not mechanically compatible. The best path is to find another part in the CJT A2008 series.