ProjectsPricingInsights

Best Alternatives to CC0402JRNPO9BN301

Package: 0402 (1005 Metric)YageoCeramic CapacitorsSeries: CCPackage: Tape & Reel (TR)Capacitance: 300 pFTolerance: ±5%Voltage - Rated: 50V

Finding a substitute for the Yageo CC0402JRNPO9BN301 300pF capacitor requires checking key parameters. While no exact drop-in is found, several functional alternatives with slightly different capacitance values are available.

AI replacement insight

Electrical riskmedium

Capacitance is 10% lower, which may affect circuit timing or filtering.

Package risklow

Candidates share the same 0402 package, ensuring form and fit compatibility.

Can it be replaced directly?

No direct, 1-to-1 replacement with 300pF capacitance was found. The closest options have 270pF capacitance and require engineering review.

Best replacement path

Use a 270pF capacitor like Yageo CC0402FRNPO9BN271, which offers tighter tolerance, but requires circuit validation.

Main risk

Capacitance mismatch.

Recommended alternatives

2
CC0402FRNPO9BN271 package
Needs validationmedium risk

A functional alternative with the same package and voltage, but lower capacitance (270pF) and tighter tolerance (±1%).

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factorCC0402JRNPO9BN301CC0402FRNPO9BN2710402N271J500CTAlt 3Compatibility / risk
Package0402 (1005 Metric)0402 (1005 metric)0402 (1005 Metric)0402 (1005 metric) / 0402 (1005 Metric) — Form and fit are identical.; 0402N271J500CT: Form and fit are identical.
Capacitance300 pF270 pF270 pF270 pF — Candidate capacitance is 10% lower.; 0402N271J500CT: Candidate capacitance is 10% lower.
Tolerance±5%±1%±5%±1% / ±5% — Candidate has tighter tolerance.; 0402N271J500CT: Tolerance matches.
Voltage50 V50 V50 V50 V — Voltage rating matches.; 0402N271J500CT: Voltage rating matches.
DielectricNP0 (C0G)NP0 (C0G)-NP0 (C0G) — Temperature characteristics match.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

Yageo's CC0402FRNPO9BN271 is a strong candidate. It has a slightly lower capacitance of 270pF but a much tighter ±1% tolerance. Engineering review is required to ensure compatibility.