CC0603KRX7R9BB823
Yageo
Needs validationmedium risk
Yageo 82nF 0603 MLCC may fit if higher capacitance is acceptable.
Best Alternatives to CC0603KRX7R9BB683
No exact 68nF replacement is proven from the supplied candidates. The closest relaxed option is an 82nF 0603 X7R MLCC.
AI replacement insight
Electrical riskmedium
all candidates change capacitance
Package risklow
kept parts are 0603
Firmware risklow
passive MLCC
Sourcing riskmedium
some candidates are NRND
Can it be replaced directly?
Direct replacement for CC0603KRX7R9BB683 should use only Datasheet verified or Strong match candidates; many approved options still require engineering review.
Best replacement path
Use CC0603KRX7R9BB823 only if 82nF is acceptable.
Main risk
Capacitance change affects filtering, timing, and impedance.
Recommended alternatives
2Alternative comparison matrix
| Feature / factor | CC0603KRX7R9BB683 | CC0603KRX7R9BB823 | GCJ188R72A104KA01D | Alt 3 | Compatibility / risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package | 0603 | 0603 | - | 0603 — same case | |
| Pinout | 2-terminal MLCC | 2-terminal MLCC | - | 2-terminal MLCC — pin count same | |
| Voltage | 50V | 50V | - | 100V — higher rating | |
| Tolerance | ±10%, 68nF | ±10%, 82nF | - | ±10%, 100nF — cap is much higher | |
| Temperature | -55..125C | -55..125C | - | -55..125C — range matches | |
| Application | general MLCC | - | AEC-Q200 soft term | AEC-Q200 soft term — grade differs |
Application & sourcing insights
Questions & answers
Verified drop-in options for CC0603KRX7R9BB683 are limited in the current batch. Review candidates marked Strong match or Datasheet verified, and validate package, pinout, and electrical limits before committing a BOM change.