CC0805KRX7R0BB472
Yageo
Needs validationmedium risk
A pin-compatible alternate with higher voltage but wider tolerance (±10% vs ±5%).
Best Alternatives to CC0805JRX7R9BB472
Find suitable replacements for the Yageo CC0805JRX7R9BB472, a 4.7nF 50V 5% X7R 0805 MLCC. This page provides a detailed analysis of pin-compatible alternatives, including parametric variations and performance upgrades to help you make an informed decision.
AI replacement insight
Electrical riskmedium
Most alternatives have a wider ±10% tolerance. One option has a different (NP0) dielectric, which is an upgrade but changes performance characteristics.
Package risklow
All viable candidates use the same 0805 package, ensuring form and fit compatibility.
Sourcing risklow
Multiple alternatives from the same manufacturer (Yageo) are available, indicating good supply chain depth for this component value.
Can it be replaced directly?
Yes, several pin-compatible alternatives exist. CC0805JKNPO9BN472 is an electrical upgrade, while others like CC0805KRX7R0BB472 are functional alternatives with a wider tolerance that must be reviewed.
Best replacement path
For high-performance or sensitive timing/filtering circuits, CC0805JKNPO9BN472 is an upgrade due to its stable NP0 dielectric. For general-purpose use, CC0805KRX7R0BB472 offers a higher voltage rating but requires verifying if the wider ±10% tolerance is acceptable.
Main risk
The primary risk is the wider capacitance tolerance (±10% vs. ±5%) of most available X7R alternatives, which could impact the performance of precision analog circuits.
Recommended alternatives
4Alternative comparison matrix
| Feature / factor | CC0805JRX7R9BB472 | CC0805KRX7R0BB472 | CC0805KRX7RABB472 | CC0805KRX7RYBB472 | Compatibility / risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package | 0805 (2012 metric) | 0805 (2012 metric) | 0805 (2012 metric) | 0805 (2012 metric) | 0805 (2012 metric) — Form and fit are identical.; CC0805KRX7RABB472: Form and fit are identical.; CC0805KRX7RYBB472: Form and fit are identical.; CC0805JKNPO9BN472: Form and fit are identical. |
| Voltage | 50.0 V | 100.0 V | 200.0 V | 250.0 V | 100.0 V / 200.0 V / 250.0 V — Higher voltage rating provides more margin.; CC0805KRX7RABB472: Higher voltage rating provides more margin.; CC0805KRX7RYBB472: Higher voltage rating provides more margin.; CC0805JKNPO9BN472: Voltage rating is identical. |
| Capacitance | 4.7 nF | 4.7 nF | - | - | 4.7 nF — Capacitance is identical.; CC0805JKNPO9BN472: Capacitance is identical. |
| Tolerance | ±5.0% | ±10.0% | ±10.0% | ±10.0% | ±10.0% / ±5.0% — Wider tolerance may affect circuit performance.; CC0805KRX7RABB472: Wider tolerance may affect circuit performance.; CC0805KRX7RYBB472: Wider tolerance may affect circuit performance.; CC0805JKNPO9BN472: Tolerance is identical. |
| Dielectric | X7R | X7R | X7R | X7R | X7R / NP0 (C0G) — Dielectric type is identical.; CC0805KRX7RABB472: Dielectric type is identical.; CC0805KRX7RYBB472: Dielectric type is identical.; CC0805JKNPO9BN472: NP0 offers superior stability over X7R. |
Application & sourcing insights
Questions & answers
The best alternative depends on your application. For highest stability, CC0805JKNPO9BN472 is an upgrade. For general use where wider tolerance is acceptable, CC0805KRX7R0BB472 is a good option with a higher voltage rating.