Is there a pin-compatible replacement for CC1206JRNPO9BN471?

Yes, several candidates like CC1206JKNPOCBN561 share the same 1206 package and are physically pin-compatible. However, they are not electrically identical due to different capacitance values, so they are not guaranteed drop-in replacements without engineering review.

What risks should I check before replacing CC1206JRNPO9BN471?

The main risk is the capacitance difference. Using a 560pF or 390pF capacitor instead of 470pF can shift filter frequencies, alter timing constants, or affect circuit stability. You must verify if your application can tolerate this change. Also, avoid parts with an X7R dielectric, as they are much less stable.

CC1206JRNPO9BN471 Alternatives, Datasheet & Cross Reference | Yageo

Yageo's CC1206JRNPO9BN471 is a 470pF 50V NP0 ceramic capacitor in a 1206 package, valued for its stability. While no exact drop-in replacements were found, several functional alternatives with the same package and dielectric are available but require careful review of their different capacitance values.

AI replacement insight

Electrical riskhigh

Using a capacitor with different capacitance or a less stable dielectric (like X7R) can cause circuit malfunction.

Package risklow

All suitable candidates match the 1206 package, ensuring physical compatibility.

Can it be replaced directly?

No direct, drop-in replacement was found in this batch. All suitable candidates have a different capacitance value, which requires engineering review.

Best replacement path

The best replacement path is to find another MLCC with 470pF capacitance, NP0/C0G dielectric, and a 1206 package. Voltage rating should be 50V or higher. Candidates with different capacitance values, like 390pF or 560pF, may work but require circuit analysis.

Main risk

The primary risk is changing the capacitance value, which can alter circuit timing, filter characteristics, or impedance matching.

Recommended alternatives

A potential alternative with the same package and dielectric, but higher capacitance (560pF vs 470pF).

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factor	CC1206JRNPO9BN471	CC1206JKNPOCBN561	CC1206JKNPOCBN391	Compatibility / risk
Package	1206 (3216 metric)	1206 (3216 metric)	1206 (3216 metric)	1206 (3216 metric) — Same package ensures physical compatibility.; CC1206JKNPOCBN391: Same package ensures physical compatibility.
Capacitance	470 pF	560 pF	390 pF	560 pF / 390 pF — Capacitance is ~19% higher. Requires engineering review.; CC1206JKNPOCBN391: Capacitance is ~17% lower. Requires engineering review.
Voltage	50 V	1000 V	1000 V	1000 V — Higher voltage rating is a safe upgrade.; CC1206JKNPOCBN391: Higher voltage rating is a safe upgrade.
Dielectric	NP0 (C0G)	NP0 (C0G)	NP0 (C0G)	NP0 (C0G) — Same stable dielectric material.; CC1206JKNPOCBN391: Same stable dielectric material.
Tolerance	5%	5%	-	5% — Tolerance matches the original part.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

The best alternatives are parts with the same NP0 dielectric and 1206 package, and capacitance as close to 470pF as possible. CC1206JKNPOCBN561 (560pF) and CC1206JKNPOCBN391 (390pF) are the closest options but require engineering validation for your specific circuit.