Is there a pin-compatible replacement for CC1206KKX7R9BB684?

While several candidates share the same 1206 package and are physically pin-compatible, none are electrically pin-compatible due to significant differences in capacitance. Using them without circuit analysis is not recommended.

What risks should I check before replacing CC1206KKX7R9BB684?

The main risk is the capacitance mismatch. The target is 0.68µF, while alternatives are typically 1µF or 0.47µF. This can affect filter characteristics, timing constants, and power supply stability. Always verify the impact of this change in your design.

CC1206KKX7R9BB684 Alternatives, Datasheet & Cross Reference | Yageo

Finding a substitute for the Yageo CC1206KKX7R9BB684, a 0.68µF 50V 1206 MLCC, requires careful parametric review. While form-fit compatible parts exist, no direct electrical matches were found, necessitating engineering validation for any alternative.

AI replacement insight

Electrical riskhigh

Capacitance values differ by over 30%, which can cause circuit malfunction.

Package risklow

All kept candidates use the same 1206 package, ensuring physical fit.

Sourcing risklow

The proposed alternatives are active parts from major manufacturers, but the original part's availability should be checked first.

Can it be replaced directly?

No, there are no direct, drop-in replacements for CC1206KKX7R9BB684 among the candidates reviewed. All alternatives have a different capacitance value.

Best replacement path

No direct drop-in replacements were found due to capacitance differences. The best path is to search for a 0.68µF, 50V (or higher), X7R capacitor in a 1206 package. If unavailable, evaluate candidates with 1µF capacitance for non-critical bulk decoupling applications after engineering review.

Main risk

The primary risk is the significant capacitance mismatch, which can alter circuit performance, especially in timing, filtering, or resonant applications.

Recommended alternatives

Shares the same package and voltage, with tighter tolerance, but has a significantly different capacitance.

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factor	CC1206KKX7R9BB684	CC1206JKX7R9BB105	CC1206KKX7R0BB474	GCJ31CR72A105KA01L	Compatibility / risk
Package	1206 (3216 metric)	1206 (3216 metric)	1206 (3216 metric)	1206 (3216 metric)	1206 (3216 metric) — Same package ensures physical compatibility.; CC1206KKX7R0BB474: Same package ensures physical compatibility.; GCJ31CR72A105KA01L: Same package ensures physical compatibility.
Capacitance	0.68 µF	1.0 µF	0.47 µF	1.0 µF	1.0 µF / 0.47 µF — Significantly higher capacitance requires circuit validation.; CC1206KKX7R0BB474: Significantly lower capacitance requires circuit validation.; GCJ31CR72A105KA01L: Significantly higher capacitance requires circuit validation.
Voltage	50 V	50 V	100 V	100 V	50 V / 100 V — Voltage rating matches the target.; CC1206KKX7R0BB474: Higher voltage rating provides more margin.; GCJ31CR72A105KA01L: Higher voltage rating provides more margin.
Tolerance	±10%	±5%	-	-	±5% — Tighter tolerance is an upgrade.
Dielectric	X7R	-	X7R	X7R	X7R — Matching dielectric ensures similar temperature characteristics.; GCJ31CR72A105KA01L: Matching dielectric ensures similar temperature characteristics.
Application	General Purpose	-	-	AEC-Q200, Soft Term.	AEC-Q200, Soft Term. — Automotive grade and soft termination are feature upgrades.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

No direct replacement was found. A potential parametric alternative is GCJ31CR72A105KA01L, which has a higher voltage (100V) and automotive-grade features, but its capacitance is 1µF. This change requires careful engineering validation for your specific application.