Is there a pin-compatible replacement for CC4-0805-CG-100V-470pF-J?

Candidates in the same 0805 package exist, but they have critical differences in dielectric material (X7R vs. C0G) and tolerance. This makes them functionally different and not pin-compatible for all applications.

What risks should I check before replacing CC4-0805-CG-100V-470pF-J?

The main risk is the dielectric material. The target's C0G dielectric is very stable. A replacement with X7R will have capacitance that changes with temperature and voltage, which can cause issues in timing or filtering circuits. Also check tolerance.

CC4-0805-CG-100V-470pF-J Alternatives, Datasheet & Cross Reference | TORCH

Finding a substitute for the TORCH CC4-0805-CG-100V-470pF-J requires careful attention to its stable C0G (CG) dielectric. While some alternatives match in capacitance and package, their different dielectric materials pose a significant risk.

AI replacement insight

Electrical riskhigh

Dielectric mismatch (C0G vs X7R) causes significant changes in capacitance over temperature and voltage.

Package risklow

Some candidates match the 0805 package, ensuring physical compatibility.

Can it be replaced directly?

No direct drop-in replacements were found. All candidates with matching package and capacitance have a different, less stable dielectric material (X7R), which is a high-risk change.

Best replacement path

Search for a 470pF, 100V (or higher), ±5% (or better) capacitor in an 0805 package with a C0G or NP0 dielectric.

Main risk

The primary risk is substituting the stable C0G dielectric with a less stable X7R type, which can affect circuit performance.

Recommended alternatives

Matches package, voltage, and capacitance, but has a different dielectric (X7R) and weaker tolerance. High risk.

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factor	CC4-0805-CG-100V-470pF-J	FCC0805B471K101DT	TCC0805X7R471K102FT	Compatibility / risk
Package	0805	0805 (2012 Metric)	0805 (2012 metric)	0805 (2012 Metric) / 0805 (2012 metric) — Package size matches.; TCC0805X7R471K102FT: Package size matches.
Dielectric	CG	X7R	X7R	X7R — Class II dielectric vs target's stable Class I (CG/C0G). High risk.; TCC0805X7R471K102FT: Class II dielectric vs target's stable Class I (CG/C0G). High risk.
Voltage	100V	100V	1000V	100V / 1000V — Voltage rating matches, no extra margin.; TCC0805X7R471K102FT: Higher voltage rating provides more margin.
Tolerance	±5%	±10%	±10%	±10% — Wider tolerance may affect circuit precision.; TCC0805X7R471K102FT: Wider tolerance may affect circuit precision.
Capacitance	470pF	470pF	470pF	470pF — Nominal capacitance matches.; TCC0805X7R471K102FT: Nominal capacitance matches.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

The best alternative will have the same 470pF capacitance, 100V or higher voltage rating, ±5% or tighter tolerance, 0805 package, and a C0G or NP0 dielectric. No ideal candidates were found in this review.