
TYOHM
Same resistance and tolerance in an 0402 package, but with a significantly lower power rating and worse TCR.
Finding a substitute for the Vishay CRCW04021M00FKEDHP requires careful attention to its high-power (0.2W) and AEC-Q200 automotive qualification. While other 1MΩ 0402 resistors exist, they typically have lower power ratings, posing a significant risk in demanding applications.
Power rating is ~3x lower. May fail in-circuit.
All candidates share the same 0402 package.
Target is AEC-Q200 qualified; alternatives are not, which may violate application requirements.
No direct, drop-in replacement was found. All potential alternatives have a significantly lower power rating, which introduces a high risk of failure.
Search for 0402 resistors specifically rated for high power (0.2W or greater) and AEC-Q200 qualification.
The primary risk is the power rating downgrade from 0.2W to 0.0625W, which could lead to overheating and component failure.

TYOHM
Same resistance and tolerance in an 0402 package, but with a significantly lower power rating and worse TCR.
| Feature / factor | CRCW04021M00FKEDHP | RMC04021M1%N | 0402WGF9763TCE | RC-02K105JT | Compatibility / risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package | 0402 | 0402 | 0402 | 0402 | 0402 — Package size matches.; 0402WGF9763TCE: Package size matches.; RC-02K105JT: Package size matches. |
| Resistance | 1MΩ | 1MΩ | 976kΩ | 1MΩ | 1MΩ / 976kΩ — Resistance value matches.; 0402WGF9763TCE: Resistance value is 2.4% lower.; RC-02K105JT: Resistance value matches. |
| Power | 0.2W | 0.0625W | 0.0625W | 0.0625W | 0.0625W — Significantly lower power rating.; 0402WGF9763TCE: Significantly lower power rating.; RC-02K105JT: Significantly lower power rating. |
| Tolerance | ±1% | ±1% | ±1% | ±5% | ±1% / ±5% — Tolerance matches.; 0402WGF9763TCE: Tolerance matches.; RC-02K105JT: Tolerance is much looser. |
| Tcr | ±100 ppm/K | ±200 ppm/°C | - | - | ±200 ppm/°C — Temperature coefficient is worse. |
No direct drop-in replacement was identified. The best alternatives require careful engineering review, as they have significantly lower power ratings (0.0625W vs 0.2W) and may differ in tolerance or temperature coefficient.