ProjectsPricingInsights

Best Alternatives to ERF1EM681G16OT

Package: Radial, 10mm x 16mmAISHIAluminum Electrolytic CapacitorsCapacitance: 680 µFRated Voltage: 25 VTolerance: ±20%Series: RFDiameter: 10 mm

Finding a substitute for the AISHI ERF1EM681G16OT, a 680µF 25V radial capacitor, requires checking both electrical parameters and physical dimensions. Alternatives exist but may require design adjustments.

AI replacement insight

Electrical riskmedium

Capacitance or other secondary parameter changes.

Package riskhigh

Some alternatives are physically larger.

Sourcing risklow

Multiple alternatives are available.

Can it be replaced directly?

No direct drop-in replacement was found. All candidates have significant differences in either package size or capacitance, requiring engineering review.

Best replacement path

If board space allows, ERS1HM681W20OT is a strong electrical match. If the footprint is fixed, 01EC4294SHC1000UF25V is a physical match but requires circuit analysis for the higher capacitance.

Main risk

The primary risks are physical incompatibility due to different package sizes and circuit malfunction from mismatched capacitance.

Recommended alternatives

2
ERS1HM681W20OT package
Needs validationhigh risk

Electrically superior with higher voltage and lifetime, but is physically larger and not a drop-in replacement.

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factorERF1EM681G16OTERS1HM681W20OT01EC4294SHC1000UF25VAlt 3Compatibility / risk
PackageRadial, 10mm x 16mmRadial, 12.5mm x 20mm-Radial, 10mm x 16mm — Same diameter and length.
Capacitance680µF680µF-1000µF — Significantly higher capacitance.
Voltage25V50V-25V — Voltage rating matches.
Lifetimeunknown10000h-10000h — Longer endurance.
Tolerance±20%-±20%±20% — Tolerance matches.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

The best alternative depends on design flexibility. ERS1HM681W20OT offers the same capacitance with a higher voltage rating but is physically larger. 01EC4294SHC1000UF25V has the same package but higher capacitance. Both require engineering review.