FAUL0754-100MT
cjiang (Changjiang Microelectronics Tech)
Needs validationmedium risk
AEC-Q200 qualified alternative with better electricals. Footprint is close but height is greater.
Best Alternatives to FXLA0630-100M
Finding a substitute for the FXLA0630-100M 10µH power inductor involves balancing electrical upgrades with physical constraints. While no direct drop-in replacements were found, several functional alternatives offer superior current handling and efficiency but require a PCB redesign due to different package sizes.
AI replacement insight
Package riskhigh
No candidates match the target's 7.3x6.8x3.0mm package. Board redesign is required.
Electrical risklow
All candidates offer superior current ratings and lower DCR, representing an electrical upgrade.
Can it be replaced directly?
No, there are no direct, pin-for-pin compatible replacements for the FXLA0630-100M among the candidates reviewed. All alternatives have different physical packages that require PCB layout modifications.
Best replacement path
For designs with tight space, FAUL0754-100MT is the best starting point, but requires careful verification of its slightly different footprint and taller profile. For new designs or where space allows, any of the other candidates offer significant electrical upgrades.
Main risk
The primary risk is mechanical incompatibility. All potential substitutes have different footprints and/or heights, meaning they cannot be dropped into an existing board without a redesign.
Recommended alternatives
5Alternative comparison matrix
| Feature / factor | FXLA0630-100M | FAUL0754-100MT | APH1040T100M | FXL1050-100-M | Compatibility / risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package | 7.3x6.8mm | 7.2x7.9mm | 11x10mm | 11.5x10.0mm | 7.2x7.9mm / 11x10mm / 11.5x10.0mm / 13.45x12.6mm — Footprint is close but not identical; requires land pattern verification.; APH1040T100M: Candidate is significantly larger, requires board redesign.; FXL1050-100-M: Candidate is significantly larger, requires board redesign.; FXL1350-100-M: Candidate is significantly larger, requires board redesign. |
| Height | 3.0mm | 5.4mm | - | - | 5.4mm — Significantly taller than target (3.0mm), check clearance. |
| Current | 4.5A | 5.2A | 7.04A | 7.0A | 5.2A / 7.04A / 7.0A / 8.0A — Slightly higher current rating.; APH1040T100M: Higher current rating provides more margin.; FXL1050-100-M: Higher current rating provides more margin.; FXL1350-100-M: Higher current rating offers more thermal margin. |
| Saturation Current A | 5.5A | 8.0A | 7.06A | 8.8A | 8.0A / 7.06A / 8.8A / 12.0A — Higher saturation current provides more headroom.; APH1040T100M: Higher saturation current improves performance under load.; FXL1050-100-M: Higher saturation current improves performance under load.; FXL1350-100-M: Higher saturation current prevents inductance drop at peak loads. |
| Dcr Ohm | 68mΩ | 38mΩ | 30mΩ | 28mΩ | 38mΩ / 30mΩ / 28mΩ / 22mΩ — Lower DCR improves efficiency.; APH1040T100M: Lower DCR improves efficiency.; FXL1050-100-M: Lower DCR improves efficiency.; FXL1350-100-M: Lower DCR improves efficiency. |
Application & sourcing insights
Questions & answers
The best alternative depends on your design constraints. FAUL0754-100MT is electrically superior and has the most similar footprint, but is significantly taller and requires layout verification. Other options like XR1265-100M offer even better performance but in much larger packages, suitable for new designs.