
RUILON
A potential alternative in the same 1812 package, but with a higher hold current that requires engineering review.
Finding a substitute for the JK-mSMD010-60 PTC fuse requires matching its 60V rating, 100mA hold current, and 1812 package. Alternatives exist but often have different current ratings that need verification.
Hold current mismatch is the primary electrical risk.
All viable candidates use the same 1812 package.
No direct drop-in replacement was found. All viable alternatives have a higher hold current, which alters the circuit's overcurrent protection characteristics and requires engineering validation.
Parametric alternatives with a slightly higher hold current, such as RUILON's SMD1812P014TF.
A higher hold current reduces overcurrent protection sensitivity, potentially exposing downstream components to damaging currents.

RUILON
A potential alternative in the same 1812 package, but with a higher hold current that requires engineering review.
| Feature / factor | JK-mSMD010-60 | SMD1812P014TF | mSMD020-60V | Alt 3 | Compatibility / risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package | 1812 | 1812 | - | 1812 — Form factor matches. | |
| Voltage | 60V | 60V | - | 60V — Maximum voltage rating matches. | |
| Current | 100mA | 340mA | - | 400mA — Trip current is significantly higher. |
There is no direct drop-in replacement. The closest option is RUILON's SMD1812P014TF, which has the same package and voltage but a higher hold current (140mA vs 100mA) that requires circuit analysis before use.