Is there a pin-compatible replacement for KS106M050C07RR0VH2FP0?

No, a direct pin-compatible replacement was not found. The most similar candidate, SPZ1KM100E10O00RAXXX, has the same mounting style but is physically larger and is a Polymer capacitor, which has different electrical characteristics that must be validated for your application.

What risks should I check before replacing KS106M050C07RR0VH2FP0?

The main risk is the package mismatch; most alternatives are surface-mount and require a board redesign. For the single through-hole option, you must verify that the larger body (6.3x10mm vs 4x7mm) fits on your PCB and that your circuit is compatible with a low-ESR Polymer capacitor.

KS106M050C07RR0VH2FP0 Alternatives, Datasheet & Cross Reference | Chengx

Find functional alternatives for the KS106M050C07RR0VH2FP0 10µF 50V radial capacitor. While no direct drop-in replacements are available, explore SMD options for new designs and a high-performance radial upgrade requiring engineering review.

AI replacement insight

Package riskhigh

Target is Radial THT, while most candidates are SMD. This requires a PCB redesign.

Electrical riskmedium

One candidate is a Polymer capacitor with very different ESR, which could affect circuit stability.

Sourcing risklow

All candidates are from active manufacturers and appear to be in production.

Can it be replaced directly?

No, there are no direct pin-for-pin, size-for-size replacements for KS106M050C07RR0VH2FP0 in this list. All candidates require either a board redesign or significant engineering review.

Best replacement path

For a new PCB design, use an SMD part like VT10UF100V167RV0127 for its higher voltage. For an existing board, SPZ1KM100E10O00RAXXX is the only option with the same mounting, but its larger size and different technology must be validated.

Main risk

The primary risk is physical incompatibility. Most alternatives are Surface Mount (SMD) and cannot fit on a board designed for a Through-Hole (Radial) part.

Recommended alternatives

A functional alternative with 5x endurance, but requires a board redesign due to its SMD package.

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factor	KS106M050C07RR0VH2FP0	VD1H100MC054000CE0	VT10UF100V167RV0127	SPZ1KM100E10O00RAXXX	Compatibility / risk
Package	Radial, 4mm x 7mm	SMD, 5mm x 5.4mm	SMD, 6.3mm x 5.4mm	Radial, 6.3mm x 10mm	SMD, 5mm x 5.4mm / SMD, 6.3mm x 5.4mm / Radial, 6.3mm x 10mm — Requires board redesign. Target is through-hole.; VT10UF100V167RV0127: Requires board redesign. Target is through-hole.; SPZ1KM100E10O00RAXXX: Same mounting style but larger body. Check layout clearance.
Endurance	1000h	5000h	2000h	2000h	5000h / 2000h — Significantly longer rated life.; VT10UF100V167RV0127: Longer rated life.; SPZ1KM100E10O00RAXXX: Longer rated life.
Voltage	50V	50V	100V	100V	50V / 100V — No increased safety margin.; VT10UF100V167RV0127: Provides increased voltage rating and safety margin.; SPZ1KM100E10O00RAXXX: Provides increased voltage rating.
Capacitance	10µF	10µF	10µF	-	10µF — matched; VT10UF100V167RV0127: matched
Technology	Aluminum Electrolytic	-	-	Polymer	Polymer — Polymer caps have much lower ESR and higher ripple current.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

The best alternative depends on your needs. For a new design, VT10UF100V167RV0127 is a good SMD option with a higher voltage rating. If you must use a through-hole part, SPZ1KM100E10O00RAXXX is an option but is larger and uses different technology, requiring careful review.