Is there a pin-compatible replacement for MX2EDGK-5.08-08P-GN01-Cu-Y-A?

Yes, several parts share the same 8-pin, 5.08mm pitch footprint. However, a true drop-in replacement requires verifying both the electrical ratings (especially the 15A current) and the mechanical housing (open-end vs. closed-end). No candidate is a guaranteed drop-in without review.

What risks should I check before replacing MX2EDGK-5.08-08P-GN01-Cu-Y-A?

The main risks are electrical and mechanical. Ensure the replacement's current rating is 15A or higher if your design uses the full capacity. Also, check the physical dimensions and housing style (e.g., open-end vs. closed-end) to ensure it fits on the PCB and mates correctly.

MX2EDGK-5.08-08P-GN01-Cu-Y-A Alternatives, Datasheet & Cross Reference | Cybermax

Q: What is the best alternative to MX2EDGK-5.08-08P-GN01-Cu-Y-A?

The best alternative depends on your application's needs. For matching electrical ratings, consider DORABO DB2EVC-5.08-8P-GN, but verify its closed-end housing fits. If a lower current is acceptable, KANGNEX WJ2EDGV-5.08-08P-14-00A is a strong form-fit candidate.

Finding a replacement for the MAX MX2EDGK-5.08-08P-GN01-Cu-Y-A 8-position terminal block header requires checking the current rating and housing style. Several alternatives exist with a similar 5.08mm pitch and 300V rating, but may have lower current capacity or different mechanical features.

AI replacement insight

Electrical riskmedium

Several candidates have lower current ratings (10A or 12A vs 15A).

Package riskmedium

Some candidates have a closed-end housing vs the target's open-end style.

Sourcing risklow

Multiple vendors offer parts in this common footprint.

Can it be replaced directly?

No direct drop-in replacement has been identified. All candidates require review for either current rating or mechanical housing differences.

Best replacement path

Verify application current; if <12A, Phoenix Contact 1757268 is a strong option. If 15A is required, check mechanical fit for DORABO DB2EVC-5.08-8P-GN.

Main risk

Electrical downgrade (lower current rating) and mechanical incompatibility (housing style).

Recommended alternatives

Cross-vendor alternative from Phoenix Contact with similar form, but a lower current rating of 12A.

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factor	MX2EDGK-5.08-08P-GN01-Cu-Y-A	1757268	WJ2EDGV-5.08-08P-14-00A	DB2EVC-5.08-8P-GN	Compatibility / risk
Package	Terminal Block Header (Open-End)	Through Hole (Open-End)	Terminal Block Header	Through Hole (Closed-End)	Through Hole (Open-End) / Terminal Block Header / Through Hole (Closed-End) — Functionally similar vertical, open-end style.; WJ2EDGV-5.08-08P-14-00A: Package name and vertical, open-end style match.; DB2EVC-5.08-8P-GN: Housing is closed-end, target is open-end.
Pinout	8	8	8	8	8 — Same number of positions and 5.08mm pitch.; WJ2EDGV-5.08-08P-14-00A: Same number of positions and 5.08mm pitch.; DB2EVC-5.08-8P-GN: Same number of positions and 5.08mm pitch.
Voltage	300 V	320 V	300 V	300 V	320 V / 300 V — IEC voltage rating is comparable or better.; WJ2EDGV-5.08-08P-14-00A: UL voltage rating matches.; DB2EVC-5.08-8P-GN: UL voltage rating matches.
Current	15 A	12 A	10 A	15 A	12 A / 10 A / 15 A — Current rating is lower than target.; WJ2EDGV-5.08-08P-14-00A: Current rating is lower than target.; DB2EVC-5.08-8P-GN: UL current rating matches.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers