
BOURNS
PTC resettable fuse with identical package and voltage, but a higher 4.0A hold current.
Finding a substitute for the Littelfuse RUEF300 PTC fuse requires matching its 3A hold current and 30V rating. Alternatives often have different current ratings, impacting circuit protection.
Using a part with higher hold current will not protect the circuit as intended.
The radial leaded package is common and easy to match.
No direct, drop-in replacement for the RUEF300 has been verified. All similar candidates have different current ratings, which impacts circuit protection.
Search for a PTC resettable fuse with a 3A hold current, >=30V rating, and a compatible radial package. Prioritize matching hold and trip current.
Electrical risk from mismatched hold/trip currents, leading to inadequate overcurrent protection.

BOURNS
PTC resettable fuse with identical package and voltage, but a higher 4.0A hold current.
| Feature / factor | RUEF300 | MF-R400 | RUEF500 | Alt 3 | Compatibility / risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package | Radial, 2-pin | Radial, 2-pin | Radial, 2-pin | Radial, 2-pin — Form factor matches.; RUEF500: Form factor matches. | |
| Voltage | 30V | 30V | 30V | 30V — Voltage rating is identical.; RUEF500: Voltage rating is identical. | |
| Current | 3.0A | 4.0A | 5.0A | 4.0A / 5.0A — Hold current is 33% higher, offers less protection.; RUEF500: Hold current is 67% higher, offers less protection. | |
| Power | 2.0W | 2.5W | 3.0W | 2.5W / 3.0W — Higher power dissipation is acceptable.; RUEF500: Higher power dissipation is acceptable. |
No drop-in replacement is confirmed. Alternatives like Bourns MF-R400 have higher hold currents (4A) and require engineering review to ensure circuit safety.