Is there a pin-compatible replacement for RVT470UF16V67RV0031?

No pin-compatible replacement has been identified. All reviewed candidates have different physical dimensions and will not fit the existing 8mm x 10.2mm footprint.

What risks should I check before replacing RVT470UF16V67RV0031?

The most critical risk is the package size; ensure the alternative's dimensions fit your PCB layout. Also verify secondary electrical parameters like ESR and lifetime.

RVT470UF16V67RV0031 Alternatives, Datasheet & Cross Reference | KNSCHA

Finding a substitute for the KNSCHA RVT470UF16V67RV0031 capacitor requires careful review. While several parts offer similar electrical specs, all identified candidates have larger packages, preventing a direct drop-in replacement.

AI replacement insight

Package riskhigh

All candidates have a larger footprint and will not fit without a PCB redesign.

Electrical risklow

Candidates have matching capacitance and superior voltage/ripple current ratings.

Can it be replaced directly?

No, there are no direct pin-compatible replacements identified in this review. All candidates require PCB layout changes due to larger package sizes.

Best replacement path

The best path is to find a 470µF capacitor with a voltage rating of 16V or higher in an identical 8mm x 10.2mm SMD package.

Main risk

The primary risk is mechanical incompatibility. All reviewed alternatives are physically larger than the target part.

Recommended alternatives

A cross-vendor functional alternative with higher voltage, but in a larger package that is not a drop-in fit.

View details

Alternative comparison matrix

Feature / factor	RVT470UF16V67RV0031	RVT1V471M1010 470UF 35V	RVT470UF35V67RV0056	RVT470UF50V34RV0133	Compatibility / risk
Capacitance	470µF	470µF	470µF	470µF	470µF — Capacitance matches.; RVT470UF35V67RV0056: Capacitance matches.; RVT470UF50V34RV0133: Capacitance matches.
Voltage	16V	35V	35V	50V	35V / 50V — Higher voltage rating provides more design margin.; RVT470UF35V67RV0056: Higher voltage rating provides more design margin.; RVT470UF50V34RV0133: Higher voltage rating provides more design margin.
Package	8mm x 10.2mm	10x10.2mm	10mm x 10.2mm	12.5mm x 13.5mm	10x10.2mm / 10mm x 10.2mm / 12.5mm x 13.5mm — Candidate has a larger diameter and will not fit the same footprint.; RVT470UF35V67RV0056: Candidate has a larger diameter and will not fit the same footprint.; RVT470UF50V34RV0133: Candidate is significantly larger and will not fit the same footprint.
Current	230mA	247mA	286mA	520mA	247mA / 286mA / 520mA — Slightly higher ripple current handling.; RVT470UF35V67RV0056: Higher ripple current handling is an improvement.; RVT470UF50V34RV0133: Higher ripple current handling is an improvement.

Application & sourcing insights

Questions & answers

The best alternatives are functional matches like KNSCHA RVT470UF35V67RV0056, but they require a PCB redesign as they are in larger packages (e.g., 10mm diameter vs 8mm).